Tecno Pova 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Tecno Pova 4
Smartphone 2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Smartphone 3
Differences between Tecno Pova 4 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 4:
- Larger battery capacity of 6000mAh compared to Redmi Note 8 Pro's 4500mAh, which may offer longer battery life.
- It runs on a newer operating system version, Android 12 with HIOS, which may provide a more updated user experience.
- Features a larger screen size of 6.82 inches compared to the 6.53 inches of the Redmi Note 8 Pro.
- Comes with a higher amount of RAM in its configuration (8GB RAM).
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro:
- Has a higher resolution display of 1080 x 2340 pixels, which results in a higher pixel density of 395 PPI compared to the 257 PPI on the Tecno Pova 4.
- Equipped with a more advanced camera system with a 64MP main camera and a quad-camera setup.
- Supports higher video recording quality with up to 2160p resolution.
- Comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for better screen protection.
- Available with a starting price of 180 EUR, which could provide better value depending on the market.
Tecno Pova 4 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Tecno Pova 4 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro | |
Rating | 4) | (+4) | (+|
Release date | 2022, October 10 | 2019, August | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 170.6 x 77.5 x 8.7 mm | 6.72 x 6.72 x 3.05 in | 161.3 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 3.01 in | |
Weight | 0 g | 0 oz | 199 g | 7.02 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5) | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey | Black, Red, Blue, White | |
Battery | 6000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
Approximate price | 180 EUR | ||
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.82" in | 6.53" in | |
Screen area | 112.3 cm2 | 104.7 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 84.9% | 84.9% | |
Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 257 PPI | 395 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
Other specs | - 90Hz | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Dual | 64 MP, Quad | |
Camera specs | -50 MP, (wide), PDAF -8 MP, AF |
-64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.7'', 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5'', 1.75µm (dedicated macro camera) -2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5'', 1.75µm, depth sensor |
|
Functions | Dual LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, (gyro-EIS) | |
DxOMark Main Score | 84 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 87 | ||
DxOMark Video | 78 | ||
Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 20 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 8 MP | 20 MP, f/2.0 | |
Functions | LED flash | HDR | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 12, HIOS | Android 9.0 (Pie); MIUI 10 | |
Chipset | - Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) | - Mediatek Helio G90T (12nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x Cortex-A76 & 6x Cortex-A55) | |
GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76MC4 | |
External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (uses shared SIM slot) | ||
Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6 GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 10 Total | 398859 | 358278 | |
Antutu 10 CPU | 130572 | 121097 | |
Antutu 10 GPU | 63833 | 70639 | |
Antutu 10 Mem | 104633 | 74568 | |
Antutu 10 UX | 130572 | 121097 | |
Antutu 9 Total | 365852 | ||
Antutu 8 Total | 291733 | ||
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 562 | 485 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1844 | 1589 | |
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 2562 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 7739 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging 18W |
- Fast battery charging 18W (Quick Charge 4+) |
Reviews and Opinions on Tecno Pova 4 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!