Zopo Flash C vs Samsung Galaxy F62 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Zopo Flash C
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy F62
Smartphone 3
Zopo Flash C or Samsung Galaxy F62 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Zopo Flash C | Samsung Galaxy F62 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | January, 2012 | 2021, February 15 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 145.0 x 71.2 x 8.8 mm | 5.71 x 5.71 x 2.8 in | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm | 6.45 x 6.45 x 3 in | |
| Weight | 145 g | 5.11 oz | 218 g | 7.69 oz | |
| Body Build | Aluminium alloy | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | |
| Battery | 2100 mAh, Li-Ion Polymer, Removable | 7000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 270 EUR | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LCD IPS | Super AMOLED Plus | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5" in | 6.7" in | |
| Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 66% | 86.7% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 294 PPI | 393 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch resistant | ||
| Other specs | - 420 nits (peak) | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 64 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, ƒ/ 2.2, (wide), 1.12 µm | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, ƒ/ | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 5.0 Lollipop | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek MT6735 (28 nm) | - Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | |
| CPU | - Quad-Core (4x Cortex A53 1.3 GHz) | - Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T720 | Mali-G76 MP12 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | ||
| Internal memory | 2GB 16GB, 2GB · 16GB | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 376125 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 2 | 302547 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 622 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1746 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1550 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 4080 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 113 | 506 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 390 | 1589 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Mini SIM + Micro SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B8 (900) -4G - B3 (1800), B7 (2600), B20 (800) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Display | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | No | Yes | |
| USB | Yes, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.692 W/Kg (head), 0.889 W/Kg (body) |
SAR - 0.74 W/kg (head) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Yes | FM radio, recording | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Proximity, Accelerometer, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 25W -Reverse charging |
Reviews and Opinions on Zopo Flash C and Samsung Galaxy F62
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!